Jennifer Casal Assignment Three

1.) In reference to Palin hits "change" Theme, it talks about how Palin and McCain came down to Colorado Springs to make a speech in front of a gathering of Republicans at the airport. Palin was “attacking” Biden and spoke about how the people would not be able to call him an agent of change (I’m guessing she’s the better candidate for change). I think that Palin is somewhat correct in that argument and is possibly the better VP for when John McCain may get elected. I think since McCain sometimes teds to be indecisive she will help him make a firm decision. Palin is down for business and that’s a quality needed for this election.

2.) “McCain has slight edge on Obama”. This article talks about how the amount of viewers that tuned in for Obama’s speech during the DNC were in the same number range as the viewers that tuned in to see McCain’s speech the opening day of the RNC. The edge they are talking about that McCain has on Obama is that he slightly got more viewers. Although numbers are solid facts you still can’t imply that all those viewers are republican or even intend to vote for McCain. I myself have watched both but I am not a voter at all. Numbers are numbers we’ll see what happens during the votes. When numerical value actually counts for something.

3.) I had more time to watch the DNC than I have to watch the RNC. Not because I haven’t made time for it or that I am more democratic that republican but because I happen to just be busier. Between the candidates for the Democratic and Republican Parties I am kind of at a stale mate of whom I would vote for if I was registered. Obama and McCain’s speeches were both strong and enlightening yet they both make very great points on the topics of America which concern them the most.

kurt, hall ASSIGNMENT 3

I find that mcain's speech was not the great but he spoke with feeling and do not talk down about the other to much more about how they were different and more about his past i did find that they talk alot about him being a a kong camp alot and i really find that to have been push a little much and it great that he stayed there with his man and he was there for such a long time but they dont have to say it a million times.
one thing that i find sick is that with palin is google more about the bikki pic. then about her take on things it seems like they want to see more of her nude then want to know what she about and when i heard that from is mr. page, and i with him thats just not right.

one more thing is how Oprah denied Palin an interview on her show. then moms and other people that watch her show get mad about her supporting who she wants to and is expressing her opinion through this. It's not cool how those people are boycotting her show. thats just not right

Mead, Danny ASSIGNMENT 3

Plain Hits "Change" Theme and Criricizes Biden
In this blog, Elisabeth Bumiller points out that Sarah Palin is now attacking both the Democrats on the ticket. It is showing that she is not afraid to challenge a seasoned politician and not a fellow relative newcomer. As she has now called out both Obama and Biden on their slogan for change, they will indefinately come back looking for dirt, although politically 'clean' dirt, and anything and everything when it comes to debates. It will be very interesting t osee how this pans out for the next few months as Election Day nears.

Ratings: McCain Has Slight Edge on Obama; Could Be Decided by Supreme Court
This article stated that McCain's speech had 38.9 million viewers, where as Obama's speech had a little less at 39.3 million viewers. I felt like it was just showing the amount of people who unintentionally voted in a popularity contest. On the same note, the RNC this year was the most watched TV political event in over forty years. I think this was just a preliminary polling as there has not been ample time for there to be any other evaluation.

Palin Good for the Democrats, Too
Michael Luo's article implied that support for the Obama/Biden campaign for the Democrats was less popular to the that of the Republicans with McCain/Palin. However, Senator Obama's campaign was expected to reach $10 million in donations by the time McCain gave his acceptance speech. The McCain campaign took in $10 million after Sarah Palin's speech at the Xcel Energy Center. I found this a very intersting point. However, the fact that Republicans have more money is not a new event. So I feel like this record breaking day for Palin is still somewhat reasonable when it's coming from millionaire oil families and not minimum wage families for the Democrats.

Grimmett Assignment 3

McCain's Speech: What to watch for

This article was written before McCain spoke at the convention. It was about things that they thought McCain will and won't say during his speech. I didn't really like the article because it made it seem like he would say all the wrong things. It did though point out the fact that Palin is a strong conservative and that she will be McCain's strong side of being a republican because to me at least it seems like he can swing either way sometimes.

Live From St. Paul: McCain's Big Night

I thought this was a good article. I liked how it talked about how Palin has a more presidential tone than McCain himself has. I thought that was funny how she can kinda outshine him in ways because she has such strong views and well might just be a good speaker too. I like how it talked about how McCain talked about not giving away money to countries that dont even like us because i remember watching him say that part when i was watching the RNC. 

I didn't really watch the RNC either but i was able to catch a little bit but not much. I saw the part when the lady was protesting in the middle of his speech which was completely ridiculous i thought at least. I also remember him speaking of savings money in ways such as not giving it away to countries we dont like. Other than that i really didn't watch any of the RNC either but i should have and i kinda regret not watching more of it!!

K Mead, Assignment 3 RNC

"Oprah says no to Palin, and gets an earful"
This article shares how much Oprah is against Palin on her show. People are particularly upset with Oprah because she wont let Palin speak on her show. Palin is telling Oprah's fans to say something about why she wont let her on her show. Some people are even deciding to not be an avid Oprah fan anymore. I think Oprah should just go with the flow and let her on her show, because this is just hurting Oprah's reputation. But on the other hand, if she held her ground on an issue that was truly important to her, she has the popularity to make a HUGE statement.

"McCain has slight edge on Obama"
About 41 million Americans watched John McCain’s speech, which is about the same number of viewers that Obama had, which was about 38.3 viewers. McCain, as suspected, had more viewers than his runner up, Sarah Palin, who only had 37.2 viewers. It’s interesting that this convention is the most-watched one since 1960. Overall McCain, though, has had more viewers which could mean he is as of now more popular but it’s hard to decide. On the flip side, one could argue that the number of viewers were higher because Democrats wanted to see the Republican reaction to the DNC speeches. Without knowing what percentage of these viewers were Democrats, or Republicans, or Independents, or any other partiality, these numbers really do not show too much about the candidates.

I watches the RNC whenever I could this past week. I truly gained a sharp dislike for the 9/11 Governor of NY. Gullianni, though incorporating witty humor into his speech, really said nothing more significant than a deer's dropping rolling slowly down a hill. Mudslinging really does not sit well with me. The Democrats' Keynote was inspirational, it rallied the troops, it pointed the voters in the right direction...but the same cannot be said for the Republicans. Even if Bidin had similar attacks, he had a point, not just aimless ranting and raving. The speech of Palin did not really do the same. She had an exact pattern to her speech as Bidin: talk about my family to get people to relate to me, then attack the opposing platform. the only difference was that she said, "John McCain is the right man for out country,"but she never said WHY!!!!
So, to all the hell-bent "right-wingers" or "left-wingers" out there, I advise you to use your God-given brains, even if out candidates seem not to. Although insults are amusing, they have a place in Shakespearean plays, but not out nations ruler's rhetoric. The gloves are off, and the real question is whether or not we are ever going to find out who the best candidate is...right now I am leaning towards the "undecided" column.
My best regards to the readers of this blog. Yes, some emotion was included, and I hope you did take offense...and I do mean "did". Maybe you defending your beliefs at school will enlighten me better than out lovely candidates did.

Happel, Jeff Assignment 3

1.) In the blog Palin hits " change" Theme, it talks about how her and Mccain came down to colorado springs and made a speech in front of a bunch of Reoublicans at the airport, Palin was attackin Biden and she said that people would not be able to call him an agent of change. i think that she is right on that matter and that she will be a great VP when Mccain gets elected. i think that since Mccain tends to lean one way or the other that she will be able to keep him in line and make sure that he makes the right choice for our country. She is a tough lady and thats what we need, not a celebrity.

2.) In the blog Ratings: Mccain has slight edge on obama, it talks about how Obama and Mccain both got about the same number of viewers when they gave their speeches at the RNC and the DNC. Mccain has a slight edge on Obama because he got a little bit more viewers than Obama did and Sarah Palin almost got more viewers than Obama did. It just goes to show that Mccain has an edge over Obama and that maybe people are starting to realize that this country needs a President and a VP that actually know whats best for this country instead of just being a celebrity.

3.) I watched more of the RNC than i did the DNC beccause i am more interested in the VP sarah Palin and John Mccain than i am Obama and Biden. I think that Palin and Mccain would just be the better of the two and they were. Their speeches were alright from mccain but palins was really good. I am looking forward to the election and when Sarah Palin and Mccain get elected what they will do. Also since my parents are more conservative the RNC was on more in our house.

Assignment Three Rojas

Oprah says no to Palin, and gets an earful
This blog was about how Oprah denied Sarah Palin an interview on her show, and how all these moms and I guess other people too are all super pissed about it. I guess I think that it's good that Oprah is supporting who she wants to and is expressing her opinion through this. It's really lame how all these people who used to worship her and take her advice daily are now unsubscribing to her magazine and boycotting her show. These people feel like she's not respecting other people's opinions and really it's just her having an opinion, and them not respecting her's.

The next blog is about how Obama finally decided to point out one of the many lies put out there by McCain/Palin. This one was about how Palin was accusing Obama of wanting more earmarks and how she was all super anti earmarks but really in the past couple of years she put like $500 million into earmarks for Alaska. I think that this sort of lieing is done a lot in politics and campaigns, but I feel that McCain and his party are really going overboard.. I mean, you see all these commercials that are like "The only thing Obama wants to do is raise your taxes and eat your babies, but I, John McCain, want to like take away taxes and give everybody ice cream." Maybe that's exaggerated a little bit, but that is what it's starting to sound like. But I think that Palin shouldn't be making remarks like this to her crowd, it's very hyprocritical, but at least Obama pointed out the falsity in it.

I think that since these blogs started I have actually grown to have a real opinion in this race (thanks a lot stahley), that's why most of what I wrote are mainly about how I don't like McCain and his party. I didn't watch the RNC at all. I was playing video games while my parents watched it in the other room, so I heard nearly all of McCain and Palin's speeches. I was not impressed. Almost everything that I heard was like what I mentioned before; instead of talking to the crowd about what they have to offer, it was more about how evil their opponent is. I suppose that's how it's always been, but I don't see Obama pulling this stunt half as much or as bad as I see McCain pulling it. I think that what McCain has been doing is really unprofessional and kind of immature, and everything that I've been hearing, and reading all of these blogs is making me like Obama more and more.

Assignment 3 Nook

1. Blogtalk: Pregnant Pause
This article talked about news that Vice presidential candidate Palin's teenage daughter is pregnant. From this news, the article became a spin off of a thousand different Republican ideals such as pro-life, family values, etc. as the daughter is deciding to have the child. Frankly, who cares? It's not Palin's daughter that is McCain's running mate, it's Palin. Sure, family values can be a factor in choosing who to vote for, but Obama agrees, they shouldn't be dwelled upon so harshly.

2. Ratings: McCain Has Slight Edge on Obama; Could Be Decided by Supreme Court
This article was basically a comparison of popularity between both the DNC and the RNC. It seems as if McCain's speech had 38.9 million viewers, where as Obama's speech had a little less at 39.3 million viewers. Also, the RNC was the most watched political event on television since 1960, but had to be cut short due to Hurricanie Gustav. At this point in the race, the odds seem to be about even for each candidate according to the viewers.

3. Politics; not a word often used in my vocabulary. I am a very stubborn person when it comes to my values and morals, and I don't let anyone take my power to think on my own away, but when it comes to politics, I just don't have the desire to know everything I can about them. I am 17 years old and I miss this years election by one month, turning 18 in December, and I think that does have something to do with why I am not quite as politically active as the rest, but honestly I think politics are boring in some ways and I don't exactly want to spend my time getting to know which candidate has which values and who's better than who. I didn't get a chance to watch the RNC this weekend because I had other plans, but if I did in fact get a chance to see it I probably would've turned off the TV ten minutes in.

Wright Jeff RNC post 3

1. "McCain Has a Slight Edge On Obama" talks about the number of veiwers who watched McCain's speech on Thursday night. It was about the same as Obama's, one week earlier, reaching over 41 million Americans. McCain acctually reached abouut 38.9 million which edged out Obama's 38.3 million, on three networks including 2 spanish-language channels. All this statistic is saying (to me) is that there are more Republicans in America. Or it says that more people were more interested in what McCain had to say after haering or reading about Obama's speech.

2. "Palin Family Welcomes McCain to Twin Cities" talks aabout the welcome McCain got as he got off the plane.It talks about how Senator McCain was very open toward the Palin family. He stoped and treated the Palin family like his own. He paid special attention to Senator Palin's daughter pregnant Bristol who made national news. She stood with Levi Johnston, the man she intends to marry. Then McCain moved on to little sis Piper and older bro Track and his two sons Jimmy and Jack. The MMcCain-Palin family is 16 strong. This shows that McCain is a family man and is very family oriented. Why else would McCain be so happy to be around the Palin family? It also shows that around family or people considered family he gets emotional.

3. Once again I did not pay that much attention to the RNC. I did hear some of what Palin said in her speeech and i do have to say that it was good and it was what the people wanted to hear.I could tell that because I could hear my dad cheering for her. I also heard a good portion of what Guliani said before Palin's speech. Guliani gave a good opening speech and got the people ready for Palin. Idid pay alittle more attention to the RNC than i thought. I should probally pay more atteneion to polotics because soon my vote will matter in selecting any type of political leader.

Morein Assignment three.

I think its interesting that more people were into McCain's speech than Obama's speech. McCain had around 41 million viewers. And Obama had about 38.3 million viewers. In my opinion, Obama still has most of the population's vote. The most interesting thing i read in this artice is that this is the most watched convention since 1960. This is truely a large point in history. It throws me off a bit that more people were into what Palin had to say than her mate, McCain. I honestly think Palin could be a good vice president, but she may be very unexperienced. But on the other side, Obama may also be too unexperienced. This is why i stay independent. I've never really been into politics ever. So i didn't watch any of the speeches. And kind of let the rest of the popultaion deal with the politics.

Arellano assignment 3

Okay I am going to wing this one. I can't figure this blog thing out yet. My opinion is still the same. I don't pay attention to politics I don't want to vote and I don't follow any of this. Maybe my mind will change and I will follow poiltics better. But to talk about the RNC I haven't really heard about McCain at all. I just know taht he is old and that I do feel like he should be elected but I am so lost with who does what and who believes what. I did not hear very much about the RNC at all, or do I hear much about McCain.

I do think that when I can vote maybe I will change my mind in thinking that it is my America as well and I should be apart of what happens in it an maybe I should pay more attention to what happens in the world. But at 17 I just feel like ther are more things to worry about, Honestly!

Olivas, Ashley Assingment 3 RNC

1.) Obama, Palin create must-see TV; I found it interesting in the article that 37.2 million people tunned in to the RNC speech of Sarah Palin, 85,00 people witnessed Obama's speech from the Invesco Field, 38.4 million watched Obama on television, and Obama's speech received the highest ratings ever for a convention. I believe Sarah Palin had an amazing speech but I am not that interested in the Republican side of the convention. I didn't watch Obama's speech but I heard that he went above and beyond with his inspirational words. This article has made me think more about the dedicated speeches that take place at the conventions every few years. I think all politicans have the same advantages in the campaign but one has to be choosen to run our country.
2.) McCain : "Fight With Me"; I disagree with all the choices McCain is planning on changing. First of all, many people can find their own jobs but some do need more help than others. We dont need the government to help us decide what we should do with our lifes as we grow up. Secondly, we can stand up for ourselfs and dont need the government to be by our sides every minute of every day and hold our hands until we have gotten to the end. With Obama wanting to reduce taxes, ending the war with Iraq, eliminating capital gains in taxes, in 10 years ending our dependence on oil, and making fuil efficient cars to help the environment be safer, the world will eventually become a better place for everyone to live if Obama gets elected.
3.) I really didnt pay much attention to the RNC because I am more interested in the democratic side of the election. I think that McCain is going to keep us where we are in the world today and Obama will make a huge difference. Plus im not allowed to vote in this election. I cant believe that more people would vote for McCain instead of Obama. I think I would possibly consider myself a democratic but I'm not quite sure.

RNC 3 Carter

Ms. Palin's Pregnant daughter, Bristol.
Palin announced this past week that her daughter, Bristol, was pregnant. Palin, 44, just recently had a child of her own, 4 month old, Trig. Rumors on the Internet circulated that her daughter, Bristol, was actually the mother of Trig. This is the reason Palin made the effort to announce Bristol's pregnancy, in order to silence the rumors. I believe that people were making a big deal about Ms. Palin supposedly attempting to cover up her pregnancy. What's the matter with your daughter having a kid or Palin having a kid? It doesn't effect what she believes in because she was recently pregnant.

Two Conventions with no shortage of contrasts
The racial contrasts between the two parties have become present these past two weeks. 95% of the years Republican voters are white compared to only 65% of Democratic voters. White republicans have grown since the RNC in 2004 yet the amount of white and black voters at the DNC have stayed around the same. This surprises me because i would think more African Americans would attend the DNC because of Sen. Obama. This tells me that black voters aren't just voting for Obama because he is black, but rather the whites are voting McCain because Obama is black. My thoughts were not aimed to offend but if they did somehow I'm sorry.

I missed both the RNC and the DNC unfortunately due to other commitments, I really did want to hear what both McCain and Palin had to say even though I'm not old enough to vote, I think it is still important to understand what both parties are saying because one of them will be running again in 2012 assuming ceteris paribus. Politics will be a big part of our future and i believe it's important to hear and give each party a chance.

Assignment 3 King RNC Post

1. Blogtalk: Pregnant Pause
The media has lost control after the news of Sarah Palin's pregnant teenager. It is not right for people to be criticizing Mrs. Palin and calling her a bad mother. Parents can't only teach their kids right from wrong they can't control what they do. Just because her daughter is pregnant doesn't mean that Palin's beliefs are no longer valid. At the same time I believe it was selfish of her to drag her daughter through this. Going into the election she knew her daughter was pregnant and accepted the VP position anyway. She knew the media would rip her and her family apart because of this "scandal" but she accepted the VP position anyway for her own selfish wants. If people are going to be criticizing Palin it shouldn't be because she is a bad mother who can't teach her kids right and wrong it should be because she put her wants in front of the needs of her daughter. It was her daughter's mistake, but her daughter didn't chose to be paraded around in public.

2. What Might have Been
Personally I believe Mit Romney would have been a much better VP choice than Sarah Palin. I am still trying to figure out why it is that Romney wasn't picked. He has much more experience and would have brought in a lot of conservative voters. After the release of Palin's daughter conservative voters might be thinking twice before voting for McCain. A lot of people see Palin's lack of Washington experience as a good thing; which to a point it probably is considering all the corrupt Washington politicians, and all things considered McCain has enough Washington experience for the both of them. People are looking at Palin as a good compliment to McCain, and a good VP choice. However if you consider McCain's age is she the best vp choice? This is where I believe Romney would have been a better pick. I believe if old age caught up with McCain during his presidency Palin is not ready to lead the nation as a president. People are worried about Obama's experience, well she has even less. If need be Romney would have been ready to be president.
3. I paid attention to the RNC, but not as much as I did the DNC. However I did watch the speeches Wednesday night giving by Rudolph Guiliani, and Sarah Palin. It's obvious that public speaking isn't something new to these politicians, as they had the crowd eating out of the palm of their hands. I've always thought Guiliani was a great speaker, and I thought his RNC speech was outstanding, but a little provocative. His clever little jokes were good for his audience, but I believe he took a couple of cheap shots at the democrats for example his "if I was Obiden I'd get that VP thing in writing." It irritates me when politicians are called "flip - floppers", I believe you need to be able to take a definite stance of certain issues, but as the United States grows and chances your views should as well. What was good for the economy ten years ago even five years ago certainly isn't good for it now. So although I thought Guiliani gave a good speech I believe his cheap shots were immature, and pathetic. Palin as well gave an outstanding speech, although I didn't really get a sense of what she wanted to do for our country. I felt as if she just outlined her experiences and talked about how she was qualified for the job despite what the democrats thought, however she didn't give anything to back it up. She gave her experience but past experience means nothing if you don't have any ideas for the future. However it became obvious Wednesday night one of the reason's McCain picked her was her outstanding public speaking abilities, although it highlights his poor public speaking
abilities.

Norris Assignment 3

MccCain has slight edge on Obama
Alot of americans watched McCains speech, but its the same amount that watched Obamas. McCain of course had more viewers than his vice, who only had 37.2 viewers. This convention is the most watched because Bush messed up the country so much, that who ever follows him has to be willing to fix the country. Thats why it is the most watched since the 1960. At theis point McCain has more viewers, making him more popular.

"Oprah says no to Palin, and gets an earful" is about how much Oorah is against Palin on her show. People are really mad with Oprah because she wont let Palin speak on her show. Palin is telling Oprahs fans to say something about why she wont let her on her show. Some people are going to the fiets of not being Oprahs fans anymore. I think Oprah should just go with the flow and let her on her show, because this is just hurting Oprahs reputation.

I didnt watch the RNC because i was at work but when i read about it i made up my find of being a democrat just because of Palins speech but it doesnt matter because i wont be able to vote anymore.

Assignment 3 RNC O'Brien

1)

More than 41 million Americans watched John McCain deliver his acceptance speech Thursday night, essentially reaching the same number of viewers that Barack Obama did last week, according to Nielsen Media Research.

In a closely-watched ratings race, Mr. McCain edged out his running mate Sarah Palin, who reached 37.2 million viewers on Wednesday night.

Mr. McCain’s speech was watched by 38.9 million viewers on the three broadcast networks, three cable news channels, and two Spanish-language channels, according to Nielsen. That figure is slightly ahead of the 38.3 million who watched Mr. Obama last Thursday on those eight channels plus BET and TV One.

I think that this comment post makes it very clear that McCain does stand a good chance and maybe even a better one at becoming president. Considering how many people were also watching his vice president speak and the comment you hear about her, I think it is proven McCain has a better chance in the elections and in my opinion go McCAIN!!! We need someone with experience and the country has shown by this television percentage that more people care about what McCain has to to say and not Obama, by a small amount yes, but this is a close race after all.

2)

This election is going to be the tale of two strong women. One who Obama didn’t chose for VP, and one who McCain did.

When I hear this comment I think of the swing votes that McCain wants to pick up. When I say that I mean the Hillary votes. He elected his vice president because of the fact she is a woman and show of his political agenda in Canada for oil. But I believe his main goal was to appeal t0o Hillary supporters so we can steal those votes from Obama. Thsi leaves McCain with a great opportunity to turn the tides.

3) My opinion on the Republican convention is that there , in the beginning, was way to much bashing on Obama because now they have fuiled his campaign and teh democratic cause. However.....I think they satnd a good chance with his vice president choice. She is very smart and will bet eh first to ever allow drilling in Alaska if it means getting rid of the reliance on foreign oil. This I believe also appelaed to not just republicans but democrats as well. This also shows he is taking it seriously and not jsut spitting words out saying waht he will do but how he will do it. I think the the Republicans with her have more than evened it out and if I could vote they would have my vote.

White, John RNC Post Three

1) The Early Word: Understanding Palin by Michael Falcone:
This article tried to tell people more about Senator Palin of Alaska. McCain has just recently chosen her to be his running mate, so not many people know much about her. The writer was clearly biased and tried to point out all of her views that are those the same of President George Bush. There are a lot of critics out there, not fond of this. I don't agree with the content of this article. I watched the speech of Senator Palin on national television. She has a son in the military, a daughter who is pregnant, and a child with down syndrome. I honestly don't know how she manages to keep the house maintain, but she has. Not many democrats are giving her a chance to show what she could do in office.

2) Palin Good for the Democrats, Too by Michael Luo
I found this article shocking beyond belief. The support for the Obama campaign was clearly inferior to the that of the Republicans. Senator Obama's campaign, was projected to reach the 10 million dollar mark in total donations, by the time John McCain was going to make his speech. The McCain campaign took in 10 million dollars following Palin's speech at the Xcel Energy Center. That is said to be a one day record.

3) I did watch the RNC this week. I really was shocked as how much I could learn about the 2008 elections just by taking an hour out of my day. The intensity of the speech given by both Sarah Palin, and John McCain, sent chills running down my spine. After the RNC was over, I realized why my mother and father raised me in a Republican household. After every comment I could just feel myself saying "Yes" after every statement. I am anxious to vote, but it wont happen for me this year. I found the conventions to be more interesting than boring, so I even shocked myself.

Boyle, Chase RNC Post Three

In the blog, "Oprah says no to Palin, and gets an earful" is an article describing how Oprah declined to have Palin on her show. And many of Oprah's fans are outraged that she won't have her on her show. Since Palin isn't allowed on the show, Palin is calling for Oprah fans to complain on Oprah's website. Even some women in Florida are boycotting her show and cancelling their subscriptions to her magazine. I think that is kind of biased that Oprah won't let a republican on her show, when she backs Obama so strongly.

In another article, "Ratings: McCain has slight edge on Obama" it speaks of the TV ratings for both of the parties' conventions. McCain and Palin's speeches reached 41 million viewers while Obama only had 38.3 million viewers. I, personally feel that these numbers are irrelevant because the difference is so small and i'm sure that there was a lot of the population was busy at the time, but could have read about it later, or even watched the speeches on iTunes.

I personally didn't watch any of the RNC, because I was busy doing homework and i didn't feel the desire to either. Partially, because I won't be able to vote this election but also because i am more interested in the Democratic side of the force.

Huffman Tessa RNC Post 3

In the aeticle "Palin Hits ‘Change’ Theme and Criticizes Biden" Palin addressed the fact that Obama doesnt always do what he says. After reading the article she had some pretty good points. The fact that Obama's campaign theme is "change" and then elects Biden as his running mate contradict eachother. Biden is a very average normal guy that had been a chairman for all didfferent aspects of government but he has tradtitional views and ideas so how would that pair led to the so called "change" they are promising? Also I thought it was a cool idea that McCain and Palin arrived to speak in Colorado SPrings to the Elvis song "I little less Conversation" it shows that they can add a little fun to a campaign and not just talk at the American people everyday.

I read the article "McCain and Palin Kick Off Post-Convention Tour" it showed how Palin has really boosted the republician party. More people are supporters of Palin than of McCain. At first I thought that was strange but when I kept reading I can totally see why. Ms. Palin is just like an average person. Her family isnt perfect and people can relate to her. They can see themselves in her even though she is a political figure she is down to earth and doesnt feel or act like she is above other American citizens and people trust her judgement. Palin was the best choice McCain could have made with her and her views the democrats have something to worry about.

The last article I read was "Two Rivals, Together on 9/11." The article talked about how the country in times of election are divided republician or democrat but more important than different public views we are one American family.“All of us came together on 9/11, not as Democrats or Republicans, but as Americans,” this quote somes up the whole article for me. I think the joint speech on 9/11 is a great idea and it will bring all Americans even closer. This article made me realize that in the end of the election we will all still be Americans and that this election has gotten blown way out of porportion.

assignment 3 sulkowski

Ratings: McCain has the slight edge over Obama: Over 41 million people watched McCain's acceptance speech, compared to the 38.3 million that watched Obama's. McCain's speech also had more people watching then his vice-president Palin's speech had. With her speech having 37.2 million watchers. What really surprises me about this artical is that according to it, Obama barely beat out McCain's Vice-president's speech let alone McCains. It shows that McCain has either a lot more support then Obama or at least that more people care what he has to say.

Palin Fund-Raises by Slamming Democrates: In Palin's letter thanking her and McCain's supporters she talks negatively about all the demorates taliking badly about her personal life. Including things such as her 17 year old daughter's pregnancy. But at the same time both Obama and his running mate Biden, have said that a candidates personal life should be off limits, and not be included in the voting process.

Once again I didnt even make an effort to watch any of the speeches, even though that I see myself as a Republican. Pretty much for the same reasons that I did not watch the Democratic convention. I just see these speeches as lieing to us, to get our votes. But once they get in office its back to their own priorities. I did catch a glimpsh at one of the speeches (not even sure whose) while on my way to turn on the tv. But all it was was a guy on stage saying "McCain wants to do this..... but his oppenent wont!" and then a bunch of people that most likely didnt even know what was said screamed "YEAH MCCAIN! GO MCCAIN!". After seeing this I just cared even less then I did before. Good luck to who ever wins.

White Assignment 3

McCain and Obama Plan Ground Zero Appearance

In this article it said that McCain and Obama would go New York and make a joint speech and honor all the people that were killed and all the people that helped with the rescue process. I think this is a great idea, I think it will show the American people that during that day we came together as a nation and during that time of crisis we came together as a country. I am very proud that our two leaders are going to get together to honor the past and put their differences behind them and help us unite as a country.


Ratings: McCain Has Slight Edge on Obama; Could Be Decided by Supreme Court

In this article it was said that Mr. McCain’s speech had slightly more viewers than that of Mr. Obama. I think that it is good that the country is so involved in this election and that the speeches are getting so much public attention. It shows what a hard decision it is going to be for America this election. Both parties are very knowledgeable and both of them have a big chance. Also the fact that this election could be decided by the Supreme Court is crazy. It is crazy to think that it is that close of a tie that it might have to rely on the Supreme Court.


Unfortunately I did not see any of the RNC. The night of John McCain’s speech I was on a bus back from boulder. But due to the good reviews I heard on both of the speeches I might look them up on you tube and compare the two. But I did not get to see any of the speeches for the DNC or the RNC so I don’t have that good of a formulated opinion on this year’s presidents but this assignment has made me want to learn more and become more involved in the politicians next election.

Assignment 3, Borner

Live from St. Paul: McCain's Big Night
I thought that this article was well written. It was interesting to find out that McCain rarely mentioned his stance on the worsening economy and really had nothing to say about it. I think that is a big deal with all the commotion going on about the gas prices, global warming, etc. and to not hit on that topic is very unreliable. Also during the RNC McCain was outshined by Palin, his number 2, who is supposed to be the runner up candidate in the Republicans. From this article it would seem like Obama has a better chance of getting elected if McCain does not step up.

McCain has slight edge on Obama
About 41 million Americans watched John McCain’s speech, which is about the same number of viewers that Obama had. McCain, as suspected, had more viewers than his runner up, Sarah Palin, who only had 37.2 viewers. It’s interesting that this convention is the most-watched one since 1960. Overall McCain, though, has had more viewers which could mean he is as of now more popular but it’s hard to decide.

Once again, I have not really paid all that much attention to the RNC or the DNC. I don’t really have a reason for not getting involved it’s just I haven’t had interest or the time to really sit down and watch the speeches. I know it’s important to grasp what is going on in the world around me but I just don’t find the convention all that interesting. And again, I am not able to vote so I don’t really specifically need to know everything about Obama and McCain but hopefully I can learn a little more about what is going on.

Assignment Three, Allen

1) The Early Word: The Home Stretch by Michael Falcone discussed McCain's speech from last night. I thought it was interesting how he noted that McCain used the word "fight" 43 times in a single speech. I find that surprising. McCain wants to fight to be nominated as President of the United States, but are there other things that he wants to fight for? Does he want to continue to fight in war?

2) Hundreds of Protesters Arrested: Colin Moynihan talked about Thursday afternoon's protests that occurred just an hour before McCain's speech. I find it astonishing that there were so many protests during the RNC rather than the DNC, or at least that we've heard about. Hundreds of marchers were arrested and charged with unlawful assembly.

3) I paid attention to the RNC much like I did the DNC--both as a want to understand each party. The RNC to me seemed a lot more spirited, but in a negative manner. The republican party seemed to discriminate more against the democratic supporters and Obama himself. I think that they could have been a little more classy and focused more on uniting America as a whole, rather than republican vs. democratic.

Stahley's Reaction for DNC commentary

One of the reasons that I became a teacher was to light fires in young minds. This is a new thing for me, this blog, but I can tell it is already making a difference. I enjoy the fact that you are reading your peer's blogs. I feel as though you are connecting in a new and exciting way.

For those of you who have not had a "giant" experience with politics, I want to say a few things.

I may come off as one who has been greatly involved for many years. This is not at all true. I was once, and I do not think this is a strange place for a teenager to be, oblivious to the world around me. In fact, I still have lapses of judgment where I consider myself to be a typical member of society, and I think this is fine.

If I was assigned this exact topic as a 17/18 year old, my response to question three would have been something alone the lines... of most of yours frankly. I would have had to explain why I didn't pay attention, and I wouldn't have felt sorry about keeping my priorities elsewhere. You are kids, and by all means, you should enjoy your adoloscence.

When I read your responses now, and mind you, I am only 10 years your superior, I am happy that you even took time out to consider, or even acknowledge that someday, something of this magnitude will effect you. For this consideration, you owe yourselves a giant pat on the back. It shows maturity, and unfortunately, I don't know how often teens your age get to wear the threads of a thoughtful, mature human. Wear them with pride.

As I become more involved (reading articles by respected sources, watching the occasional news program, speaking to elders who I think "know their stuff") I have realized something: I enjoy being not just a typical member of society, but an informed and even intelligent, outgoing member, who isn't afraid to voice an opinion. It feels good to get into a respectful conversation with a stranger and exchange ideas. It feels good to be able to wear a shirt that displays my political beliefs and have wanderers stop me and comment. This goes for those who agree with me, and for those who don't, because anyone who is intelligent can still learn to respect those who do not agree with their opinions.

I am 27 years old, and I have voted in every election since 2000. Until now, I voted based off of minimal understanding. I hope that when you decide to vote, that it is done with intelligence. Do your reading. Read about the people who represent you. Criticize even those who you support. Search and define what it is that makes you an American citizen. Not everyone in the world shares your right to decide, so don't waste your decisions, and certainly don't take them lightly.

I got into a deep discussion with a dear and intelligent friend of mine who tried to convince me that he was not going to vote because he didn't feel as though his vote mattered. I was disturbed. But it taught me something that I want to share with you.

It isn't the vote that counts. It is the opinion that you hold within yourself that is displayed with a vote that matters. If we were a nation of followers, the word "Independence" would drastically decrease in value. Being independent is truly something to be proud of, and by voicing your valuable opinion, you express your right to be free on a very large scale. Your vote may seem small but remember, "No single raindrop feels as though it is to blame for the flood." If everyone loses sight of what a vote means, we could be in the midst of a very scary drought.

Stahley

Assisgnment 2 Rojas!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The first blog that I'm responding is one that talks about Obama being the first Afro-American presidential nominee. I think that it's great that we are getting more diversity in all aspects of our country, but I still am for some reason surprised at how people take factors like race into their lives. I guess the generation that I grew up in is one that truly began to treat everyone the same, so its hard to judge people from their race like that. There are some people that discriminated against him for not being white, and I think that at this point they need to get over that fact and focus on his beliefs and what he stands for.

The second blog I read about is one that was discussing Hilary's speech and her part in the convention. I don't really care that much about politics themselves, I honestly don't really know what the difference is between republicans and democrats, but I'm glad that Hilary is finally doing something to support her party and has decided to help Obama.

As for my involvement with the DNC, there isn't really any. I'm sorry but like I said before, it's not the actual politics I care about, and if I do feel like having a political opinion, it's not going to be based off of what the nominees say or promise because a lot of it probably isn't true-and I don't blame them for it. I just like who I like based off of who I feel has better morals I guess...it's hard for me to put it. I'm sorry Stahley but I'm not really going to watch tv for some people talking if I'm not even going to watch it for interesting shows and cartoons hah.

Assignment Two Sulkowski

38 Million View Obama’s Speech; Highest-Rated Convention In History: As the the first ever African American accepted the nomination for president, 38 million viewers where watching. This is a huge number compared to any other nomination acceptance. Obama's viewer count was huge compared to John Kerry's who had 24.4 million people watching, and George Bush's 2004 acceptance which was watched by 27.5 million viewers. This means that more people watched Obama's acceptance, then did the final American Idol, and even had more American viewers then then opening ceremony in Beijing.

The Early Word: Tonight’s the Night: This was the day that Obama would accept the Democratic nomination. It was said that Obama's speech had been created around other huge speeches including John F. Kennedy's in 1960, Ronald Regan's in 1980, and Bill Clintions in 1992. Obama's speech was being held on the 45th anniversary of the "I Have a Dream" speech as well as on the third anniversary of Hurricane Katrina. 2004's Democratic nominee focused in his speech on Obama patriotism, in being American, saying that "This election is a chance for America to tell the merchants of fear and division: You don’t decide who loves this country. You don’t decide who is a patriot.”

I honestly dont care what so ever. I sat down the first night for about a whole 30 seconds before I was bored to death, and either had to leave and do something, or fall asleep right there. I guess a reason that I dont care is that Im more of a Republican but that still doesnt really make sense, because I wont be watching the Republican convention either. I have no desire in listening to some old guys telling (lieing) me about what their going to do to make the world and the United States better, when as soon as they get into office, theyll just forget everything they told us now, and continue with their original plan. In the end I believe that no matter who wins, in the end they lose. The way I see it is that the president's real job is to give us someone to blame, when something doesnt work out. So good luck McCain and good luck Obama. Just give it a few months to a year, and everyone will be talking about how horrible you are of a president just like with Bush.

Mead, Danny Assignment 2

"Jackson: With Obama, More Racial Barriers Fall" by Peter StevesonThis blog emphasizes the fact that Obama is the first African American candidate showsthat racial equality is becoming more accepted in America. I agree with the author because today, racial stereotyping and racial slurs are still common regardless of the face that the US is considered equal. I think that Obama's nomination will help make race not as much of a defining characteristic for people and everyone will learn to accept people Americans, not a race."With Clinton All the Way, Now Uneasy About the Next Step" by Jackie CalmesThe author was very convinced that Obama has gained the support of Clinton supporters. I feel that the nomination of Obama has created a division within the Demiocrats. Because of Obama's differences with Hillary, I believe McCain will actually benefit more because he selected a woman to run as VP with him on the ticket. McCain will win most of the votes of people who are undecided. It will be interesting to see how the candidates change as they become more of a team with their VP's, and not just lone running candidates.I wasn't really too interested in the DNC becuse I am not totally in agreement with any of the parties. I feel like the Republican party is wrong about the war in Iraq and the Democrats are too liberal to actually get any of the "change" that they use as their slogan passed. I feel like this ecection is not going to result in much actual reform, but it will stand for the mindset of Americans being willing to accept change. I feel like the major perople that are going to initiate change will be the vice presidents.

Assignment Two Grimmett

The first article i read was about the war in iraq and national security. The article says that Obama was kind of making fun of McCain because he said McCain would follow Bin Laden to the gates of hell but not into his secret cave. I think that was kind of mean even though i dont really understand what he meant by it completely but i dont think that is a way of winning the election.

The second article i read was about how obama wanted to give aid to Gustav. He acted  as if he was so certain he could get so many volunteers to help out down there and to raise a lot of money to help out. I think he was just trying to sugar coat himself to look good. I dont think this was really needed to be said by him.

I didn't pay any attention to the DNC and didn't even care to because im not really interested in it. Obama doesn't really interest me at all anyways so i didn't even want to take the time to watch stuff i disagree with anyways. Not that i disagree with all of it just most things. 

Assignment two DNC

As for the DNC in my opinion.........first off I hated what Al Gore had to say as giving a rude comment to his (what was suppose to be) victory in the 2000 elections. And then his comment on republicans ruining our markets and overall economic well being of our country. I think, and according to graphs of our GDP and our economic standing over the last 20 years it can be said and debated over two economic theories that our country has been RUINED by the democrats and the Clinton administration. So that is for starters. On a more bright note, I think Obama gave an extremely heroic type and savior typoe attitude in his speech and was very optomisic in his manner and approach. He was also very kind and careful in not disrespecting McCain and instead saying that he can just do the job better and not attacking McCain on a personal note. He seems very confident and I believe he is running an excellent campaign and has chossen his people and his vice president wisely. In my opinion, I believe whoever the people vote for is the right man for the job, and if not, it is the people of the U.S who will be at fault for it.

Assignment two O'Brien

You have to wonder if McCain is glad that Bush won’t show his face at the convention. At this point Bush can’t be a help to the Republican party.

response: considering that no one wants another Bush, of course he doesn't want support of the Bush's. McCain is a lot smarter than that and to prove he doesn't want their support he did say something. McCain being a congressional medal of honor winner and a POW their was a question about the Bush administration and his treatment of prisoners. McCain was asked if Bush has been torturing prisoners. McCain responded being a prisoner of war himself he didn't like the way the American armed forces were treating and interrogating the prisoners at all and Bush is handling the situation terribly.

Gee, who would have thought that during an election year the Republicans would FINALLY grow an empathy gene and pull out all the stops to help in an disaster?

Will Americans ever learn that Republicans will do WHATEVER it takes to get elected during an election year, but as soon as they get elected, they go back to being the protectors of the rich and powerful. They only know how to drain the purses of the middle class and ignore the poor.

responses: I do agree with this statement because change is not a Republican tradition. They are heavely involved with the biggest fortune 100 companies out in America. The oil companies for example have quite a stranglehold on the economic direction and markets in the U.S. So I would agree that the Rep. party is overly supporting the oil companies. As for the disintegrationof the middle class it is a result of our inflationary gap and both parties have created that problem NOT just the republicans.

K Mead, DNC Post 2

1. Hillary Supporters Split

Hilary Clinton had gained a population of voters who had supported her ideas on what the nation needed. The voters did not agree with Obama, and now that he won the candidacy, not many of them are going to votre for him. There was just too much mudslinging in the early campaigning, and now there is a split, one that probably will not be closed. After they both got too far against each other and now don't share the same ideals.

2. Obama Priases Clinton's Speech

Its wierd that politicians will change their minds on subjects that they were hell bent against not a week before. Obama was very against Hillary's opinions, but when she sommends him on his victory and gives him her vote, he accepts her, and praises her. Because of examples like this I don't trust politicians entirely. I want them to have their opinions, and keep them


3. I have been following the DNC because I want to know what the beliefs of Obama are so I decide who to vote for. I went to the Round Table and I heard the ideas of people who are aligned with Obama, and what they thought of his platform. It was interesting that foreign leaders thought the US had a responsibility to get involved although they had no input for what their own countries were doing to fight this problem. Some of the ideas were a little against my own beliefs, but im glad I exposed myself to others ideals.

Shawntell Arellano DNV post two

Honestly, I did not pay attention to anything with the DNC. I feel like although this is a big election, I can't vote in it and I do not plan on voting either. This election is a tough one to talk about, but debating is easier for me. I feel like Obama is well a big risk and McCain is old but sometimes age causes someone to be very smart.

The Dnc was exciting to have in our hometown, but it caused lots of issues in the downtown area. The DNC although maybe be inerterseting to someone or maybe to someone who just takes the time watch it, but politics have always bored me. I do pay attention to who says what but anything past that I do listen to. I feel like the running people will say things to make the other runner up sound like a bad person. Sound slike drama to me. I ave my own opinion in this election and listening to them all talk in a room and cause mayhem just is annoying to me.

Maybe my opinions will eventually change when I can vote, but until then I am not very interesting.

Wright, Jeff DNC post

1. "A Tale of Two Conventions" talked mainly about the first couple of nights at the convention. It said that the Clintons, Bill and Hilary, were the main focus. Senator Clinton sang farwell arias at events hosted by Demorcratic women's groups. I guess she did that because she was sad about nt being nominated in anything that would deal with the President. A few of the attendies shouted Hilary for 2012. It is no wonder that some people would want to see Hilary as President and want to see her run again in 2012. In what the blog refered to as "Convention 2", it talked about Obama's night at invesco. The Clintons were no where to be heard of on that night. With 70,000+ people at Invesco to see Obama, he clearly was the only star of the night.

2. "Rangel at the Convention" is a very simple blog. It talked about Represenative Charles Rangel and how he was not expcted to adress the DNC. He was in full-throated support of Senator Clinton during the primaries and was not all that enthusiastic about Obama. He said that the media had inflated the issue of him not on the list for spaking. he did show up and paid a joint tribute to Stephanie Tubbs Jones a former represenative from Ohio who died. i alsothink that Rangel showed up because he wanted to show support for Obama even though he did nt care much for him.

3. I really did not pay any attention to the DNC. I am just not interested in polotics because it is boring stuff. Some people I talk to, like my dad, make polotics sound interesting but it is just something I can not get into therefore it does not interest me.

Assignment 2 norris

In the blog, "A Tale of Two Conventions", Clinton gave a great speech, not only was about Obama, who she mentioned him at the end of her speech, but she talked about her views on everything. I find it funny that they told Clinton that she had to act good and give Obama their full support.

Another blog, "A Big Night: In Denver", I think its funny how presidents have to cut down each other to get their point across. I mean Obama had to cut down on McCain's goals, to make his goals sound better. Why dont the presidents focus on what their goals are and how they are going to improve the country. When watching Obamas speech I like how he listed the major problems that anyone knows already and makes it his major goal to fix. Yes thats important but tell us how you are going to fix the economy for example.

When watching the DNC i give Clinton alot of credit for giving a speech without using prompts and getting her main points across very well. Since i cant vote this year i am not following the elections very closely, but i support Obama and would vote for him if i could.

King,Alita DNC Post Two

1.)For Veterans, These Politics Are Personal:
This blog really got me thinking about how vets, or active millitary must feel around elections. Typically people vote for a president based on their economic/foreign policy, or their morals and views on sensative subjects. For military members voting must be a whole different story. Although they volunteer to put their lives on the line, my guess is they would prefer not to have to take the chance. When a soldier votes they are voting for their life; as when we vote we're voting for the lives on the men and women on the front lines.

2.)McCain Camp Promotes Surprise Ad
After watching hte add McCain released speaking to Obama, I wasn't sure how to react. Part of me felt like what a good add in the mists of all the mudslinging policts, but that's just it; it was a nice add as a part of mudslinging politics. I think it was a great thing for McCain to have addressed Obama, and his achievments, but I don't believe this was a sincer pat on the back, but just another tricky campaign trick. Now while all eyes are on Obama giving his campaign speech, eyes will shift to Mccain, and his "nice ad" that acknowledges Obama's achomplishments. Personally I believe the ad was put out not to recognize the accomplishments of Obama, but to turn heards and put the spot light on McCain.

3.) This week I was able to go down to part of the DNC with the school. Although we weren't in the Pepsi Center amongst all the action, but it was still a really good experience. We were able to listen to different U.S. leaders, U.N. leaders, and Ben Afflack talk about their views of world poverty, and their ideas on how to solve the problem. It was interesting to listen to different perspectives other than those of U.S. leaders. I found it interesting that all the foreign leaders thought it was the United States duty to get involved although they had no input for what their own countries were doing to fight this problem. Although I didn't agree with all their views it was extremely exciting being able to listen to political leaders speak, since I'm hoping to have a future career in politics.

Boyle, Chase DNC Post Two

In the blog, "The Big Night: In Denver"  I found that the major points of Obama's speech were very broad and vague. He said that he wants to jumpstart our economy and restate our role in the world, but exactly what does that mean? Shouldn't he be giving clear goals he plans to meet? And I found it funny that he made fun of McCain's goals, when Obama hasn't even shown any of his.

In another blog, "A Tale of Two Conventions", there were many observations of the Clinton's roles in the convention. Hillary gave an amazing speech that not only glorified her views, but she barely talked about Obama until the last minute or so of the speech. Also in the blog it spoke of how the Clintons had to be on good behavior and give Obama their full support.

I haven't been following the DNC a whole lot, mainly because I won't be able to vote so it isn't that interesting to me. However, I did catch a lot of Hillary's speech which i thought was done very well. If I can remember correctly, I don't think that she even used speech prompts. So i give her mad props for that...but i still dislike her. And only a woman who is power hungry will stay with the husband that cheats on her and i wouldn't be surprised if he still does...I know i would if i was married to her.

Olivas, Ashley DNC Assignment Two

1.) In the article Live From Denver: Big Night, I found it interesting that more people believe that John McCain is a more plausible commander-in-chief and would make a better president than Barack Obama. I would have to disagree with that because I think Obama would make a great president even though he might make some stupid mistakes along the way. I agree with all the social issues that are mentioned in the article because there are ways to help protect the people and the United States from unwanted pregnancies and terrorism to help make the world a better place. According to this article, Barack Obama needs to step it up a knotch if he plans on obtaining more votes than McCain. Obama has promised to cut the taxes for everyone, but still plans on staying in the war with Iraq. I agree with cutting down the taxes because it does help but I disagree with Obama wanting to stay in war because I believe that the U.S. has fought long enough and world peace should be spread.
2.) In the article Obama Lands in Denver, I found it mainly focusing on his presidential acceptance speech that would be given at Invesco Field to the entire public concerning his presidency. I agree that Obama will be able to give a fantastic speech this year as he did in the year 2004. Obama is an inspirational person and that's what's caught the attention of many people who got involved in this years political campaign. He should be himself throughout the campaign and see how far it gets him. If Obama is more workmanlike, then he will obtain more votes for this year and be able to show the United States that he truely can run a country as the president. I hope Obama doesn't take his power to far or to seriously in the campaign because then the U.S. might be in trouble. I do wonder what Obama has in store for the world such as helping people in their daily lifes. If Obama wins the elections, the world will see what he can do for us and how he can change the United States.
3.) I haven't been paying much attention to the DNC because I am not a huge fan of politics but I do enjoying seeing who wins the elections each year. Since I am not 18 and not allowed to vote, it doesn't really matter to me. But when I do turn 18 I plan on voting and being more involved in politics. These are the reasons why I'm not that involved.

White, John DNC Post Two

1) "With Clinton All the Way, Now Uneasy About the Next Step" by Jackie Calmes was an interesting article. Jackie Calmes seemed very convinced that Obama won the hearts of the Hilary Clinton supporters. I disagree with this for a couple of reasons. I believe that the nomination of Obama, as the democratic nominee for presidency; created a division between members of the party based on race and sex. In my opinion, Obama could of secured the position of President of the United States if he would of chosen Hilary Clinton as his running mate. While Obama boasts of change, I believe that McCain has shaken things up by choosing a woman to run as his running mate. I believe that McCain will capture more of the Hilary Clinton
vote by this strategic move. McCain clearly showed through his actions and not his words that change is what was needed in this country.

2) "Obama Lands in Denver" by Jeff Zeleny is another article I diagree with. He says that he is going to help out middle class families. He defines the rich as making 250,000 or more a year. In California, for example making $250,000.00 a year defines a middle class family. These people already pay high taxes and don't qualify for the same write-offs as the "poor". Middle class how you define this term? The cost of living in parts of our great nation are more in some areas than others.

3) I personally have not payed much if any attention to the DNC, but I was able to view a little of Obama's acceptance speech on the final night of the DNC. His campaign is centered around change. My question is change what, what kind of changes? His slogan seemed very obscure to me. Change is such a broad word and I believe that he is not pointing out the specifics. He also used a lot of "ahs", "ums" and seemed to ramble on. I can't vote this coming November, but if I could it would be McCain. My family is made of strong republicans and I can't wait for the RNC. Politics aren't exactly a big part of my life, but I would like to be aware of the person in charge of our country.

Tessa Huffman DNC Post Two

In the article titled Blogtalk: All About Palin I found it interesting how people can be so judgemental. The fact that she is a woman shouldnt be labeled as incapable or not as good for the job as a man. Its shocking that people can accuse her of showing bad character when she lives everyday taking care of her son that was born with downs syndrome. I think she is a wonderful choice for vice president because she is a role model for women. She is very intelligent and has taken on being a mother and having a career. Hillary Clinton was a woman and look at just how many supporters she still has even being out of the running for president. I think a woman should be put in office as vice president at the very least in hopes that the stereotypes of women not being as capable of doing a "man's" job are finally once and for all eliminated. Everyone claims the sexes are equal until an opprotunity comes up for a woman to take over what is typically a job of a man. In my opinion our country needs this, we need a new perspective.

In the article The Sunday Word: Convention Suspension? it shows the concern of the Republician party because of the Hurricane President Bush wont beable to speak on Monday and they are considering holding off the convention to show their support for the tradgic hurricane. I found it really cleaver of McCain to not mention his possible choice of Palin as a running mate because all of the Democratic mud slinging was towards Mitt Romney and other more well known people. After reading this article I honestly feel Sarah Palin was a good choice and the Democrats should watch out because the Republicans will still back the spot light and hold on to it until they are reelected.

Being in US government this year I am forced to watch the DNC. Being republician it was a painful task however I happened to catch Hillary Clintons speech at the beginning of the week. I think it is great how many people are still following her and loyal even though she isnt the democratic canidate. She is well spoken and persuasive which makes me wonder why Obama was choosen in the first place. Regardless I think that Obama's most strategic move to get votes was to have Hillary speak because by himself against a crowd he would fail miserably. After watching the DNC I am excited to see the differences in the Republican Convention.

Happel, Jeff DNC Assignment Two

1.) In the blog, A Tale Of Two Conventions, it talks about how hilary and bill clinton had to be on their best behavior for the DNC, because people whp were Hilary "fans", and everyone wanted to see if she would swallow her loss in the Democratic vote. Also it talks about how she went to groups to talk about Obama and people were yellin Hilary for 1012. i think that she wouldn;t have any sucsess in 1012 either because she is a nut job and would not be good for our country. She cries all the time when she doesn't get her way and anyone who cries when something goes wrong is just not fit to run our country. And she and her huband are Insane!

2.)In the Blog, The Big Night: In Denver, there is a huge picture of Obama on the stage with huge columns on his side with video screens in them and everything. This just goes with what i beleive that Obama is just in it for the fame and popularity. I mean huge columns is a little much. Is ceasar returning back to rome? He is a celebrity, not a president.

3.) I have not been paying any attention to the DNC at all because i think politics are really boring and i didn't really care that all the Democrats were down here in what used to be a republican state. I probably won't watch ant of the RNC either, but if it was in denver i would probably be more into it. I just don't care for the DNC or Obama.

Allen, Brittany DNC Post Two

1) "A Tale of Two Conventions" by Jill Abramson kind of made me mad. I think that the people voting need to disregard Hilary Clinton and realize that she is not the Democratic candidate for the elections in November. People need to move on and start listening more to Obama and make the right choice for president, without taking into consideration Clinton because she really is not even apart of the electon anymore.

2) "Jackson: With Obama, More Racial Barriers Fall" by Peter Steveson depicts that since Obama is the first ever African American candidate for President, equality amongst races is being created in America. I find this really interesting. I have to agree with Jackson because in America today, racial stereotyping and racial remarks are still made even though our country is considered to be full of equals, regardless of race and gender. I hope that since Obama has been elected as the Democratic Candidate for the 2008 election, race will become less of something to diversify people by and for everyone to accept each other for who they are.

3) I have watched the DNC quite frequently this week. I have seen the speeches presented by Hilary Clinton, Michelle Obama, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden. I have paid attention because I think it is interesting to see their perspectives of the past years and how they are going to change America in the future, and since I will be around for the future, I want to know what I should be expecting. And even though I won't be able to vote in the 2008 election, I think it is worth knowing what a possible leader of your country wants to change and do during their term as president of the United States.

WhiteDaniel Assignment Two DNC

August 27, 2008, 11:04 pm — Updated: 12:33 am -->
Jackson: With Obama, More Racial Barriers Fall
By Peter Stevenson AND Sam Wallis

1) I think that one good thing that Obama has done is break down racial barriers. He is showing people that race and gender don’t play as big of a roll in America as they used to. Although having Obama run has not completely stopped all racism in American, it has definitely opened people’s eyes to new ideas and opinions about race and gender which helps us as a country expand and head in the right direction towards equality.


August 29, 2008, 2:00 pm — Updated: 3:00 pm -->
38 Million View Obama’s Speech; Highest-Rated Convention In History
By Brian Stelter

2) I think it is hard to believe that Obama’s speech was the Highest-Rated convention in history. I do not believe that his speech had more viewers that the opening ceremony of the Olympics. A possibility for these high ratings would be people’s curiosity on his political points and views on certain issues. But overall I do not understand these rankings because there has been way more interest in earlier presidents political campaigns than that of Obama. But I can understand these High ratings and I hope that john McCain can match these High numbers.




3) I have not paid any attention to the DNC this year. I am not able to vote so I do not see the point in watching these conventions. Plus I was raised in a very democratic household so my parents do not watch the DNC so I had no one to watch it with. Also my brother is democratic so I get to hear all of Obamas opinions on issues through him, so I don’t have to watch the boring speeches that the candidates give.

WhiteDaniel Assignment Two DNC

August 27, 2008, 11:04 pm — Updated: 12:33 am -->
Jackson: With Obama, More Racial Barriers Fall
By Peter Stevenson AND Sam Wallis

1) I think that one good thing that Obama has done is break down racial barriers. He is showing people that race and gender don’t play as big of a roll in America as they used to. Although having Obama run has not completely stopped all racism in American, it has definitely opened people’s eyes to new ideas and opinions about race and gender which helps us as a country expand and head in the right direction towards equality.


August 29, 2008, 2:00 pm — Updated: 3:00 pm -->
38 Million View Obama’s Speech; Highest-Rated Convention In History
By Brian Stelter

2) I think it is hard to believe that Obama’s speech was the Highest-Rated convention in history. I do not believe that his speech had more viewers that the opening ceremony of the Olympics. A possibility for these high ratings would be people’s curiosity on his political points and views on certain issues. But overall I do not understand these rankings because there has been way more interest in earlier presidents political campaigns than that of Obama. But I can understand these High ratings and I hope that john McCain can match these High numbers.




3) I have not paid any attention to the DNC this year. I am not able to vote so I do not see the point in watching these conventions. Plus I was raised in a very democratic household so my parents do not watch the DNC so I had no one to watch it with. Also my brother is democratic so I get to hear all of Obamas opinions on issues through him, so I don’t have to watch the boring speeches that the candidates give.

Assignment 2 Borner

1.38 Million View Obama’s Speech; Highest-Rated Convention in History
-This article was very interesting. I find it hard to believe that Obama's speech is the highest-rated in History because to me it seems like there have been a lot of talk about other presidents before him. It is crazy that his speech alone got more viewers than the opening olympics, last show of american idol, and the grammys.


Obama Lands in Denver
-Obama stated in this article that he was very concerned about how to better the lives of middle-class families. He was not concerned for a lot of high rhetoric. It is very cool that the democratic convention was held right here in Denver. Obama practiced his speech right in Invesco field, right in our backyards. I really wanted to go see the convention but did not have the chance too.

DNC- I did not really pay attention to the DNC all that much. This is because first of all I will not be 18 to vote in the election so I won't have any affect in the election. Also I am just not really interested in politics because they bore me. That is pretty much why I just don't watch any of the convention.

Assignment Two STAHLEY

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/

This week's assignment has changed. Too much is going on right in your hometown. In order to see the "Blog" in action, click on either the link above, or the title "Assignment two STAHLEY" to view the NYTimes Political analyst team's blog about the Democratic National Convention.

The news here is huge. It is happening 20 minutes away from most of your homes. Some of you are even going to be a part of this page in history. I want to hear your thoughts on a once in a lifetime experience.

All you have to do this week is this: Scan the link of the NYTimes Blog. Scan closely. There are hundreds of Blogs, posted by the minute as the reporters are sitting in your very own Pepsi Center. Choose 2 that interest you. You may want to focus on a particular speech, speaker or even celebrity appearance. You may want to look at two different aspects. Either way, you will choose two blogs, and react to them. Your reactions will vary.

After you have reacted to two bloggers from the NYTimes, you will construct your own blog about your experience so far with the DNC. It may even say that you have not paid any attention. I hope this isn't the case, but if it is, tell us why!

3 Parts, 30 pts. Post everything as a "New Blog." Use the format in the "title" portion, First Name, Last Name, DNC Post Two. The assignment is due Sunday, Aug. 31 at 11:59 pm so you can watch and react to any portion of the DNC. Please share any and all thoughts about a piece of history.

STAHLEY

Assignment one O'Brien

1) The parts about Mexican culture that I find interesting is that they seem to do anything for money and their culture is very corrupt. However, on the flip side I see that their culture is also in recognition of these problems and the people are wanting to act on it. One question I have though however, is why do they cross our border and run away from problems. Its obvious as can be that they do (no offense) and that they don't fight their government for the their liberties and fight murder and corruption?

2) My view of Mexico is now slightly different, I knew they had problems, but to know that their police may be kidnappers and murderers...I think that their government is not running any what of a free country and is beginning to sound like a fascist. I matter of ever going to Mexico, I would say that chance is ruined and gone. If I cant trust the Federal government with my safety and suspicion of their stance on justice is on trial by the country. I would never go somewhere as unsafe as Mexico for it.

3) When I think about this article and lifestyle from a Mexican citizens point of view I would indeed live in fear, but the thing is thats the point of criminal, fascist, and terrorist acts...fear. I would stand up for myself and so should the citizens, I think it is time for a revolution or something in their country to show the government that the people have all the power. I believe that to contrast how America responded to 9/11. Americans went to war for this and we are winning and being very successful in restoring peace and spreading democracy.

assignment 1 Wright

1. I find it hard to find a nything interesting with Mexico City. If I had to make out one interesting thing it would also be the most disturbing. It is that how much the Mexican government is currupted. The article makes it sound like most of the police officers in the major cities are dirty.I mean look at Tijuana, it has more kidnappings in the world other than Baghdad. The drug trafficing down there also plays a big part in the kidnappings. When you talk about how many officers are in Mexico, it seems like the majority of them turn the other cheeck when a crime happens for a few bucks. My follow up question has to be, why is the Mexican government letting all these kidnappings happen?

2. I always knew thatMexico was in a sence weak but this has put a whole new perspective on things for me. It sort of seems like the police force is almost trying to take down their own government from the inside. The more corrupt officers the government gets is like having officers that stand against everything that the government stands for. i have never been to Mexico nor do I ever plan to after reading this article. People there just abduccted anywhere they can and even in broad daylight. And I would not want to be kidnapped.

3.A situation like this would most deffinatly keep me on edge. This incident would make me want to have more security as well as make sure I know who I'm with at all times. This is probally how most people felt after the 9/11 attack. The kidnappeers are terrorists that reside in Mexico. After hearing about the kidnappings and the corrupt police, it would deffinatly make me more suspicious and loose trust and repect to the police watching me in the city. These happenings would make me more sceptical to people I do not trust.

assignment one mikenorris

I cant believe that many people get killed from abductions, I thought that was very rare. When I think about it though Mexico in some parts are very violatent and can believe this. It says that there was 800 abductions in the past 40 years or so. I wonder what the people think when they venture outside of there house knowing there could be a chance that they could get abducted or sometimes killed. I think the main problem that needs to be solved fast is the trustworthy of police nowadays I mean there are so many corrupted cops out there now, I dont know who to trust anymore. I cant even imagine how many corrupted cops there are down in Mexico. I beleive if Mexico solves this problem they will lower there abduction casuality rates dramaticly.

Assignment 1

1. I find it very interesting that this happens in Mexico. No not really, I think that Mexico is just a horrible place and for the people stuck there I feel bad. But how can I just don't understand how this stuff actually happens. Reminds me of the movie Man on Fire. Great movie same story line and everything. What comes over someone to do this.

2. I have always viewed Mexico as a waste of time space and air. Not trying to be tht mean but, This stuff happens unfortunately and that reall sucks. I have not been to Mexico and I do not plan on ever going to Mexico I think it is a total waste of time and money, to go down there.

3. I would be afraid as well to call the police or have anything done or looked into by the Mexico Police. That just tells you why the crime rate in Mexico is so bad because everyone is scared to do anything about it. Why would I put my life in danger to help someone else. Makes no sense to me.

Assignmemnt 1, K.Mead

1. Thinking about all the corruption that has riddled our neighboring country seems to be spreading. What is the first step in solving this issue if it is ingrained into society? If somany people are involved in the drug smuggling, what can can the president do to fight drugs when those who are fighting are also involved in it?

2. People in Mexico have no more home than an active military base in Baghdad has. People in Tiujuana and Juarez have hard times making a living as it is, not to mention that they cannot trust very many people. I went to Mexico a few years ago, and now that I realize how corrupt some people really are, then I would show more alertness and more vigilant safety measures. The poeple are just trying to make a living, and they all seem to be pretty poor. Although they are all very kind and generous, I couldn't help thinking how they could stand to live while still giving up food and time talking with us.

3. Living in Mexico must be a frightening experience to those who have no choice. I have nowhere to turn for help because lots of people are not trustworthy, and even government officials cannot ease the tension and troubles. It is just hoplessness. The feelings that attacks are constantly turning up your life is very similar to 9/11 and lots of people deal with loss and there is probably a minor loss of faith in the nation.

Assignment One King

I find it disturbing that so many cops are involved in the kidnapping of citizens, when they are suppose to be protecting the streets. They are abusing their power and endangering citizens. A lot of my family lives in New Mexico so when we go to visit we usually go down to Juarez, to go shopping, so rather than the touristy spots I've seen how the majority of the people in Mexico live. When we go to these areas my parents, aunts, uncles, etc are very careful to keep me close by, they never let me wonder by myself no matter where I go. I think if I was a Mexico City resident I would be afraid to walk my own streets. I realize here in the United States people are abducted, and murdered, but I think it takes a different position when it is the police kidnapping and murdering citizens. If you can't trust your law enforcement to keep you safe, who can you trust to protect you? I think after some point it's something you accept as a part of your daily routine, so you take extra precautions to keep yourself safe. After 9/11 many people were afraid to go to work. I know I was afraid for my parents to go to work everyday; when they left the house I constantly wondered if I would see them again that night. Eventually it was something we as a society learned to deal with, and although the kidnappings in Mexico are tragic, I believe it is something the Mexican people know is a long way from being solved so they have to live their lives the best they can. It's like school shootings in the United States, they are tragic every time they happen, but every time they do we don't stop going to school; we take extra precautions and make them a part of our daily lives.

Assignment One Boyle

1- I think that it's disturbing that this is an everyday occurrence to these people, and there isn't anyone to help them since the police are sometimes in on it. How bad is Mexico's economy that one must go and kidnap someone for ransom money to survive, rather then getting a job?

2-Seeing that the police are sometimes in on the illegal activities this changes my perspective about the security of Mexico to tourists. I have been to Mexico, rather recently, and I did not feel threatened at all. Probably because i was in a major tourist town, but now i will definitely feel a little differently about the federales.

3-I think this wouldn't cause me to live in fear, but rather i would be more careful to look out for suspicious behavior. When we were attacked on 9/11 we were very paranoid about another attack so airport security was very high and i believe that if one of my friends was kidnapped i would feel very threatened as well.

Assignment One Olivas

1.) The aspect of the Mexican culture that I find disturbing is the fact that the police are involved in the kidnappings and crimes that are taking place. The police are suppose to be in charge of the crimes and help protect the world from terrorists, robbers, murderers, and killers but instead they are involved. I also find it disturbing that the family paid $6 million to get their kid back but the kidnappers decided to kill him. Why does the governement allow the police to become involved in the kidnappings? How come there are so many deaths due to kidnapping taking place in Mexico right now?
2.) The involvement of the Mexican Federal Police doesn't change my mind about Mexico at all because I have been going down there recently at least once every year for vacation with my family. I have been to Mexico 6 different times with my family. Each vacation lasted between 1 week to 2 weeks. I have been to Cabo, Cancun, Cozumel, Paradiseus, and Barcelo. I enjoy going down to Mexico because I think its fun ands its a good way to help me improve my spanish. One specific time when I went to Cancun, I decided to go to the city with my parents and everywhere I went I saw homeless people sitting around the streets. I thought it was extremely sad and I felt bad for all of them. I wanted to try and help them, but there wasn't much I could do at the time.
3.) I would fear living in Mexico because you really can't count on anyone to help you out in a time of need or crisis. The people who may be helping you could be the police who are involved with the crime. The kidnappings in Mexico and 9/11 are two different situations. The kidnappings were attacks in the same country and on the same people who have been living there before. Many of the terrorists were trying to get as much money as they could for kidnapping children whose families are extremely rich. 9/11 was an attack by al-Qaeda upon the United States. Terrorsits took control and completely ruined the World Trade Center Buildings by hijaking the planes. Some of the most explanable reasons 9/11 happened were because Osama Bin Laden had been involved with the CIA recently, the humiliation of Islam, U.S. foreign and economic policies, and immigration.

Assignment 1 Mead D

1) I find the fact that so many government officials are involved in one of the biggest issues for Mexico interesting. I think it aids to many of the social issues because, if the police are trafficking drugs, then many people won't see the wrong in it. I wonder if the new President will do anything besides getting the army involved to settle things down and to get society's trust back?



2) I feel bad for the people of Mexico. They really have no security and cannot trust the people who are supposed to protect them. I have been to Puerto Vallarta and Juarez recently, and the families that live there are always hoping to make some money selling goods or pass the time by just talking to Americans attempting their language. I would go back, but I now know that the threat of drugs and kidnapping are real, and that you just need to be careful where you end up.



3) If I were living in Mexico, I would not live in fear for my life necessarily, but I would definately be aware of everything in my life. Who was around my house, and what they were doing. The police just worsen the situation because, even if something bad were to happen, I would be better off working it out myself instead of calling the police, which would just make more problems for my family.

Assignment One White

I don't know how the residents of Mexico could walk the city streets without a sense of there life possibly ending that day. When 9/11 struck the hearts of Americans, many were afraid and still are afraid to board an airline. I know that I would be terrified to leave my house at any point in the day. One disturbing thing about this was how Mexico's police could be involved with some of the kidnappings. That would scare me even more as a resident. I can't believe how far the country of Mexico has fallen into corruption. Many Americans every year count on going to vacation in the hot spots, but I think tourrists might second guess that trip to Cancun. May the Marti's have peace in their lives.

assignment one sulkowski

1) I find it pretty disturbing that people would rather just try to fix the problem on their own, since calling the police will only get them in more trouble. Its also pretty disturbing that even after the family paid $6 million, the kidnappers killed the child anyway.
Why did the kidnappers kill the boy, even though they got paid?

2) I have always wanted to go to Cancun, but now I dont know. This makes me want to stay as far away from Mexico as possible. This is horrible for their tourism because now people are scared to go visit their country. This is giving Mexico a horrible reputation and making look like a horrible place, with violence and killing everywhere.

3) If I was a Mexican resident I would get as far away from Mexico as possible. I would not be able to live in the fear that either I or someone in my family, could be kidnapped at anytime, and killed even if we did everything they wanted.

assigment one hall

I think it is very sad that is happen in Mexico, and there is nothing they can do to stop it from happen. I really think that this story is a little bias. See it all from one party point of view. Not say that there point of view is wrong it just I would like to know both and when I went look for the other side of the story there was none. That fine that there wasn’t but I like to know I little more on the story before saying what right and what wrong. But what I can make out from this story is that the article makes it sound like most of the police officers in the major cities are dirty. There is a little about this bring point of drug trafficking but what I think about that bring a part of it well then that make a lot of people here in the USA to be blamed as well as those cops. People here buy the drug that they make and sell so well they are also to be blamed for this action. But I do think that the cop did seem like the majority of them turn the other check. This story was all new news to me. I thought this was very rare to be happen, even in a county like that. If it is true that cop are kidnapping citizens I think that is very disturbing. I been there twin on a vacation and I would have even thought that was happing there.
I think that the kidnapping in Mexico and 9/11 are very different things. The kidnappers are people that are a part of that county and 9/11 we were attacked by an outside terrorists group called al-Qaeda and the attack on use was to make money on it, like the kidnappers it was to try to hurt use. There in one thing both this thing have that are the same and that is to have people live in fear and I think that is what the news has been trying to make us feel.